Atelier Démocratique « OMeR editor »
 Welcome, Guest.
 You can read all messages, but to be able to post,
 please Login or Register.
Nov 21st, 2017, 3:57am 
   Atelier Démocratique
   Editing Improvement

   OMeR editor
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply | Notify of replies | Send Topic | Print
   Author  Topic: OMeR editor  (Read 4630 times)
Question: Do you support the proposal below?

Yes     56 (98.2%)
No     1 (1.7%)

Total votes: 57

Please read this before voting

     

Olivier Guillion
Administrator
*****






   
WWW | Email

Gender: male
Posts: 6033
OMeR editor  
« on: Nov 9th, 2005, 11:07am »
Quote | Modify

Description:
An editor to help OMeR recognizing complex scores (for example  
indicating manually clefs, systems, ...).
 
Difficulty:

 
Product(s):
offline

Olivier Guillion
Myriad Software
bubu42
Board Master
*****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 8532
Re: OMeR editor  
« Reply #1 on: Nov 9th, 2005, 11:00pm »
Quote | Modify

Oui, car je trouve qu'OmeR a du mal dès que la partition est un tantinet complexe.
offline
Francois Desjardins
Beta-tester
Board Master
*****



Écrire et écrire encore de la musique!

   
WWW | Email

Gender: male
Posts: 2355
Re: OMeR editor  
« Reply #2 on: Jan 6th, 2006, 10:00pm »
Quote | Modify

on Nov 9th, 2005, 11:07am, Olivier Guillion wrote:
Description:
An editor to help OMeR recognizing complex scores (for example  
indicating manually clefs, systems, ...).
 
Difficulty:

 
Product(s):

 
Très désiré!!!!  
offline


François Desjardins
Mick Rochard
Board Full Member
***






   
WWW |

Gender: male
Posts: 989
Re: OMeR editor  
« Reply #3 on: Jan 6th, 2006, 10:34pm »
Quote | Modify

on Jan 6th, 2006, 10:00pm, Francois Desjardins wrote:

 
Très désiré!!!!  

 
Egalement! Omer a besoin d'avancer, je n'arrive pas a m'en servir, je butte, pas simple, il faut du temps pour trouver, il faut bien sûr aller vers tout ce qui peut le faire évoluer.
« Last Edit: Feb 1st, 2006, 10:27am by Mick Rochard » offline

Cordialement. Mick
http://www.mick-rochard.com
Robert_A.
Beta-tester
Board Senior Member
****



Vocalist

   
WWW |

Posts: 1934
Re: OMeR editor  
« Reply #4 on: Jan 18th, 2006, 4:07pm »
Quote | Modify

This would be very desirable. BUT, there is already an industry leader in score recognition (Sharpeye?). It would be difficult for OMeR to catch up. There is a fundamental difference between software that creates (MA/HA/VS), and software that must interpret existing creations (OMeR), especially when there are no fixed rules for the existing creations. Creative software is easier to change. I suggest that Myriad devote its resources to the creative programs that already rank highly.
offline
teyab
Board Newbie
*




eso sí, tantos caminos ...

   


Gender: male
Posts: 85
Re: OMeR editor  
« Reply #5 on: Jan 30th, 2006, 1:31pm »
Quote | Modify

SharpEye is indeed a good program.
Unfortunately, i have lots of problems with OMeR and i mostly have to rework the scanned systems almost from scratch.
 
Problem is, SharpEye (2.25) exports MIDI or NIFF (and Recordare's MusicXML). MIDI imports in HA are problematic (typically 4~6 voices madrigals): voices scrambled which means quite some moving staffs around again. As for NIFF, Olivier answered way back in 2002 (?) that he didn't plan to support this format.
On the other hand, why should he (they) open the barn to stray hounds ?
 
i think out loud: could they licence the SharpEye engine
Yes, an editor would be great !
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen aus Teutschland,
cb
offline

singing in the brain
teyab
Board Newbie
*




eso sí, tantos caminos ...

   


Gender: male
Posts: 85
Re: OMeR editor  
« Reply #6 on: Jan 30th, 2006, 1:47pm »
Quote | Modify

http://www.myriad-online.com/cgi-bin/workshop/YaBB.pl?board=file;action= display;num=1131529879
 
Je viens de voir que celà pourrait changer ?
mais je préfèrerais qu'OMeR devienne un grand garçon :))
offline

singing in the brain
bubu42
Board Master
*****





   


Gender: male
Posts: 8532
Re: OMeR editor  
« Reply #7 on: Jan 30th, 2006, 3:14pm »
Quote | Modify

on Jan 30th, 2006, 1:31pm, teyab wrote:
Problem is, SharpEye (2.25) exports MIDI or NIFF (and Recordare's MusicXML). MIDI imports in HA are problematic (typically 4~6 voices madrigals)

I tried MusicXML imports from SharpEye into HA and it works pretty well.
offline
Laurier
Beta-tester
Board Senior Member
****



Québec, Canada. Classique, jazz, opéra, blues, etc

   


Gender: male
Posts: 1420
Re: OMeR editor  
« Reply #8 on: Jan 30th, 2006, 4:39pm »
Quote | Modify

on Jan 18th, 2006, 4:07pm, Robert_A. wrote:
This would be very desirable. BUT, there is already an industry leader in score recognition (Sharpeye?). It would be difficult for OMeR to catch up.

The problem with SharpEye is that it is PC only. I'd rather see Omer grow...
offline

Laurier NAPPERT (Voyez mon nouveau site ci-dessous)
http://web.mac.com/lauriernappert/
teyab
Board Newbie
*




eso sí, tantos caminos ...

   


Gender: male
Posts: 85
Re: OMeR editor  
« Reply #9 on: Jan 30th, 2006, 6:18pm »
Quote | Modify

Quote:
I tried MusicXML imports from SharpEye into HA and it works pretty well.

Thank you , i am going to try this.
  <-- this little bugger shows me how to turn my tongue in my mouth before speaking up loud ...
offline

singing in the brain
Luis
Beta-tester
Board Junior Member
**



Portugal

   


Gender: male
Posts: 148
Re: OMeR editor  
« Reply #10 on: Jan 30th, 2006, 7:07pm »
Quote | Modify

Check you Sharpeye version because it's now version 2.66 dated 6 Jan 2006, and supports latest XML version.
 
regards.
offline
teyab
Board Newbie
*




eso sí, tantos caminos ...

   


Gender: male
Posts: 85
Re: OMeR editor  
« Reply #11 on: Feb 1st, 2006, 9:52am »
Quote | Modify

Quote:
version 2.66 dated 6 Jan 2006, and supports latest XML version.  
Thank you !
 
MusicXML is proprietary though.
recordare's Michael Good:
http://www.lim.dico.unimi.it/maxproject/max2002/docs/MGoodMAX2002.pdf
 
What about a 'standard' that didn't pass yet, competes with a dozen of other proposals and which 40 (sic!) apps support as of 2005 ...
IEEE P1599&#8482;/D2.0 Draft:
http://standards.computer.org/sabminutes/2005Fall/5.C-draft-PAR1599-Bagg i.doc
"MusicXML is a universal translator for common Western musical notation from the 17th century onwards. It is designed as an interchange format for notation, analysis, retrieval, and performance applications. The MusicXML format is open for use by anyone under a royalty-free license, and is supported by over 40 applications"
 
What concerns early polyphony ("17th century onwards") ich gucke wieder in die Rohre (intraduisible ~le bout du tunnel~l'autre côté de la lorgnette ?) bref, not sure at all that the format will address early music aspects successfully in the future.  Or remain "royalty-free by that (think of TNEF or SenderID for instance: attempts at 'standardizing' by you know whom ...)
 
 
 
 
 
Je vote pour OMeR !
 
 (-(((((((>--    ici une injection d'hormone de croissance pour notre sympathique gaillard  
sorry pour la longueur et la pédanterie du message.
amicalement,
cb
« Last Edit: Feb 1st, 2006, 9:23pm by teyab » offline

singing in the brain
Nik_A
Board Newbie
*






   


Posts: 11
Re: OMeR editor  
« Reply #12 on: Jun 15th, 2006, 5:02am »
Quote | Modify

I'd like to say (pardon le anglais, je parle francais pas) I have seen Photoscore which was built for use with Sibelius but not by the same programmers. It works but the editing tools are different. If OMeR could have editing tools as close as possible to HA it would be a huge advantage. (Good on you to all at Myriad for a great effort)
offline
jihel9
Board Senior Member
****




baryton

   
Email

Gender: male
Posts: 1959
Re: OMeR editor  
« Reply #13 on: Aug 1st, 2006, 7:42pm »
Quote | Modify

oui à 100 %, malgré plusieurs essais, je en suis pas encore parvenu à obtenir une copie correcte.
 
Mais je suis tenace, je ré-essayerai.
Bien le bonjour.
offline

Jean Louis, à Anthisnes (25 Km au sud de Liège)
Harmony Assistant, la dernière version
Win 10, Intel I3-5010U, 8gb, Chrome / Firefox / Edge
francophone (traduction automatique des autres langues)
Babysteps
Board Newbie
*





   


Gender: female
Posts: 46
Re: OMeR editor  
« Reply #14 on: Jun 11th, 2008, 8:42am »
Quote | Modify

Hi all,
 
I think having 3 equally strong products are better then 2. After all, it is already there why not make it better? Consider also that the other 2 products have already been developed and nurtured...in other words you can only do so much and improved so much.  I'm sure we all like to think that softwares are endless, but at some point we need to take a break to start learning the features we have added.  
 
Omer doesn't require a lot of editing just some tweaking to make it better. It also due for an update (since 2004?) I know there's a lot of similar softwares that does a great job...but why give them the business? I frankly, like all the people/teams  that had developed the products on this site and want them to make money.  I mean I have practically brought all the softwares on this site. It make me feel like a family here... except I don't get any benefit from being a family member darn.  I'm like a cousin that only visit once a while, and only come when there's a problem. Hehe
 
Anyway even thought I don't know all the people involved in creating the products...I know it's a good product and it should deserved some tender loving cares so it could grow up to be just as strong as the other products.  
 
~Ann
« Last Edit: Jun 11th, 2008, 8:51am by Babysteps » offline

"If you think you don't know, you do. If you think you do know, you don't. What a twisted way of thinking, so stop thinking and just do." ~Ann
Pages: 1  Reply | Notify of replies | Send Topic | Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

« Atelier Démocratique » Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.1!
YaBB © 2000-2002,
Xnull. All Rights Reserved.

Top of page
Legal information Last update:  (c) Myriad